skip to Main Content
The smarter way
to do assignments.

Please note that this is just a preview of a school assignment posted on our website by one of our clients. If you need assistance with this question too, please click on the Order button at the bottom of the page to get started.

Continuation of this paper. So just continue where you left off. My teacher said it’s a good start. Then intro just needs to be strengthened.
This is the old paper:
The liaison between socioeconomic status and aesthetic distinction is an exciting topic among different scholars that have tried to define the relation objectively according to their comprehension. Socioeconomic status refers to a person’s social positioning or a set of people frequently measured in education, salary, and profession. At the same time, aesthetic distinction refers to an individual having the good taste to pick out attractive and still quality goods and services. The socioeconomic status of a person directly affects an individual’s ability to pick a good commodity (Wang et al. 555). For example, a person with adequate knowledge of goods can spot a fake faster than an individual who lacks the ability. The same applies to income; that is, an individual with a well-paying job is used to consuming quality goods and is therefore used to good taste, thus quickly detecting any lousy commodity. The paper will focus on two literature pieces, “The Spoils of Poynton” written by Henry James and “Distinction” written by Pierre Bourdieu.
As specified in the above paragraph, socioeconomic status and aesthetic distinction have a particular affiliation. In “The Spoils of Poynton,” Henry iterates a story about the Gereth family, a well-off family residing in Poynton Park. The residential house has an expensive collection of tapestries, art paintings, and furnishings. The three-membered family shift to a problematic phase when the father, Mr. Gereth, dies, leaving curated possession in the estate to the son, Owen. Mrs. Gereth believes she has good taste, primarily due to her excellent socioeconomic background. Subsequently, that son’s fiancée, Mona Brigstock, is bad for Owen, and she does not deserve to end up with her collections. In Waterbath, another town in the novel, Mrs. Gereth makes a friend, Felda Vetch, whom they share the same taste: their distaste in Waterbath’s pretense of a lovely place while it is ordinary. Poynton from the novel is placed where the people’s socioeconomic status is “exquisite” in terms of ranking. Mrs. Gereth believes Felda Vetch is the best for her son, for she will preserve the beauty of the furnished house in Poynton, unlike Mona, who the widow thought had a minimal good taste like his son. Mona values Owen’s inheritance but does not appreciate the house’s beauty, best shown when she plans some alterations to the house, including the relocation of Mrs. Gereth from Poynton to Ricks.
In “Distinction,” Pierre Bourdieu describes a controversial, among sociologists, theory about a person’s taste and socioeconomic status. Pierre postulated that influential people in France’s society defined aesthetic distinction, and the socioeconomic status of individuals determined their cultural preference, likes and dislikes. Pierre Bourdieu further claims that class configuration in the community is replicated through cultural capital accumulation which might serve as a doorway to greater social status circles or occupations. The critical assumption to Pierre’s theory is that what entails cultural capital is mutually approved by all the society segments; otherwise, the people exhibiting zero cultural capital would thrive in alternative societies. Pierre Bourdieu gives an example of how an ugly picture may become an attractive picture due to substantial cultural capital influence to describe how visual aesthetic objects, including people, are more significant than inner connotation. Individuals with minimal capital cannot get higher cultural capital volume due to minimal means to increase their value.
Bourdieu, Pierre. Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. Harvard university press, 1984.
James, Henry. The spoils of Poynton; A London life; The chaperon. Vol. 10. Scribner’s, 1908.
Wang, Lili, Yanfen You, and Chun-Ming Yang. “Restrained by resources: The effect of scarcity cues and childhood socioeconomic status (SES) on consumer preference for feasibility.” International Journal of Research in Marketing 37.3 (2020): 557-571.aper:


Clicking on this button will take you to our custom assignment page. Here you can fill out all the additional details for this particular paper (grading rubric, academic style, number of sources etc), after which your paper will get assigned to a course-specific writer. If you have any issues/concerns, please don’t hesitate to contact our live support team or email us right away.

How It Works        |        About Us       |       Contact Us

© 2018 | Intelli Essays Homework Service®